the impulse the reviewer has -- same as mine -- to "re-read" the image -- to regularize it. the text has been made by folding and then it must be read as folded. why?
also, the idea that things could be written to be folded -- as paper craft, things were written, then folded and that folding was a writing (mine and baum different but related, I think to DuPlessis' folds), but then there is the writing TO BE folded. can be either folded or not. can be folded this way or that.